Find Mediators Near You:

Bold Moves

This was conflict resolution blasphemy. As my client shared her story – for the fourth time – about how a colleague had mistreated her, I realized it wouldn’t be helpful to continue to actively listen. Blasphemous because the sustained attention and feedback I usually employ pays high dividends. But in the late stages of this complex case I noticed my impatience as she again recited other people’s wrongs and touted her innocence. My focus, it seemed, threatened to reinforce her victim-perpetrator version of a two-sided dispute.

It was time for a dramatic shift to reawaken my attention and, more importantly, break an impasse. What I was about to ask was risky and precious. “Risky” because I’d have to take a withdrawal from the trust I’d built with her. “Precious” because what I asked for was among the few things that might be accepted by her nemesis.

This rare gem was her reflective answer to the question: “What bold, unexpected offer can you make to resolve this?”. I was asking her to actively, consciously overturn the well-worn dynamics of this years-long conflict. Let’s unbundle the question to give you another tool to guide employees to resolution.

Bold: It was too late for weakling comments like, “I'm sorry you felt upset when I called you lazy.” This was a situation to place real value at the feet of her coworker; the newly cliche “go big or go home” fits here. It was time for, “I’ve reflected on your reaction to my behavior and how it affected you. It’s inexcusable I called you lazy because you’re not. I’m sorry and I promise not to insult you again.”

Unexpected: Conflict is often a ping pong game in which the ball is tethered to a zip line. Person A says “X”, Person B responds “Y”. Back and forth it goes along a predictable route. So there’s real power in asking disputing employees to surprise each other by intentionally straying from the path. Think of it as constructive shock and awe.

Offer: An effective litmus test is whether it’s known in advance that the other person will happily accept the offer. Is it something he’s been asking for all along? In this case an important piece of her offer was to be fully receptive, rather than defensive, to his feedback.

It worked. She delivered a four-point offer in the next In-Accord facilitated, face to face meeting. As the ping pong ball dropped into an unexpected place there emerged acceptance, meaningful two-way negotiation and resolution.



Christopher Sheesley

Chris Sheesley, MA and his team at In-Accord put derailed workplace relationships back on track. Leaders hire In-Accord when they recognize the need for experienced, objective facilitators to transform high-stakes or seemingly impossible internal disputes into cooperation and employee efficiency. Chris is among the most seasoned conflict management professionals in… MORE >

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


Can Assertive Behaviors in Negotiation be Viewed as Feminine?

International Center for Cooperation and Conflict ResolutionAre female negotiators penalized for asserting too much? Our experiences and past research seem to indicate yes. However, for women to be perceived as...

By Regina Kim

Farah Pandith TEDx Boston Talk: “Dismantle” Hate With “Counter-Narratives”

Watch this TEDx Boston event featuring peace and conflict resolution promoter, Farah Pandith. She is also the first ever US Department of State Special Representative to Muslim Communities. She talks...

By Jeff Thompson

Poor Behavior 5: Being Dismissive

Conflicts of Interest Blog by Vivian Scott Don’t you find it frustrating when you have an idea that you’re dying to share and after getting out only a few words...

By Vivian Scott