Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation by Dan Simon
When I spend a day teaching mediators who were originally trained in a
Facilitative approach, many questions start with “So how do you get them
to. . . ?” That question reveals that the asker has a different sense
of what self-determination means than I do. That is, I don’t want to
get clients to do anything. I find that clients tend to do certain
things with my support, but it’s their choice whether and when they do
those things; and it’s their choice whether they want to do . . .
anything.
The following sort of conversation is common:
“But how do you get them to, say, be more reasonable?”
“Again, that’s not my goal. So I let go of that agenda. If I think of
them as being unreasonable and if I feel the urge to make them behave
differently I, first of all, notice that I’ve lost sight of my purpose.
My purpose is to support their process of decision-making and
perspective-taking. If they’ve decided to say something like ‘I will
not consider offering him anything. He doesn’t deserve it. He’s lucky
I don’t kill him, much less compromise with him,’ I support that
choice.
“But I thought you do transformative mediation! How do you get them to
transform?”
“Ah, common misunderstanding. Transformation happens in transformative
mediation, but not because I tried to get them to transform. It happens
because clients have the ability and the preference to behave with
strength and responsiveness; and it happens more easily when a mediator
is actively supporting a conversation, if the parties wish to have a
conversation. The support that a mediator provides creates more
opportunities for clients to shift toward greater strength and
responsiveness.”
“Ah ha! So you do try to get them to transform!”
“No I really don’t. I try to support the conversation. What they do
with that is their choice. If they don’t move toward greater strength
and responsiveness, that’s ok too.”
“Huh. Weird.”
I’m curious how other transformative mediators communicate this point?
How do you explain to people that you really want parties to make their
own choices about everything, but that at the same time, you like it
that they often make shifts?
From the Blog of Phyllis G. Pollack. While none of us ADR Professionals were looking, California enacted a new form of alternative dispute resolution in the form of a summary...
By Phyllis PollackIndisputably Our good friend Jean Sternlight (UNLV) sends along her opinions on Sharif, one of last week’s Supreme Court cases and how it impacts the Federal Arbitration Act. The Supreme...
By Art HinshawFrom the Mediation Matters Blog of Steve Mehta.One of the things that I hear often in mediation is the concept that the case is about money. Although the answer to...
By Steve Mehta