Find Mediators Near You:

A New Dawn. Will the Mediation Act, 2023 change the way parties resolve disputes?

A New Dawn. Will the Mediation Act, 2023 change the way parties resolve disputes?

With commercial disputes and litigations on the rise in India, will the Mediation Act, 2023, change the way parties resolve disputes?

Historically, mediation has been commonplace in the Indian context, with the Gram Panchayats (Village Council) serving as the mediator at the community level to help resolve disputes of all kinds. The concept of mediation is not new—it has always been available as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism for parties in a dispute. Mediation also stands out as a mechanism that can be tailored to the needs of the disputants, offering a highly flexible and adaptable process for dispute resolution. Therefore, the recent Mediation Act, 2023, is seen as progressive by the industry and the legal fraternity.

However, mediation has always been an informal and ad hoc process. Lack of standardisation and varying approaches followed by different mediators tend to have a significant impact on the outcome of the mediation process. The institutionalisation of the mediation process and the enforcement of ensuing agreements make the Act a much-awaited development for a litigious country like ours.

The salient features of the Act include provisions for setting up a Mediation Council of India (MCI), ensuring the confidentiality of proceedings, recognition of mediation institutes, empanelment of mediators, timelines within which mediation should be conducted, along with the withdrawal option from proceedings, and circumstances under which mediated agreements can be challenged, among others.

The industry, however, was divided on a key aspect of the Bill, which prescribes that pre-litigation mediation should be voluntary. While the initial version of the Bill had proposed to make pre-litigation mediation mandatory, the Parliamentary Standing Committee’s recommendation to make it voluntary has been accepted.

Proponents in favour of voluntary mediation argued that making it mandatory would have defeated the very purpose of the proposed legislation.

Mandatory mediation may result in frivolous proceedings being initiated by parties under default, with no intent to resolve the dispute, only further derailing the process. Those in favour of mandatory mediation have questioned the utility of this provision, stating that mediation has always been available as a recourse to disputants—so why the provision?

Easing workload

The Act is certainly a step forward in facilitating the ease of doing business in India and easing the pressure on the judiciary. But its implementation depends a lot on the timely setting-up of the proposed MCI that is tasked with laying down standards and regulations to drive the process forward.

Certain gaps will need to be addressed—such as the qualification of exceptional circumstances under which interim relief can be sought, the qualification criteria for the appointment of MCI members, the inclusion of non-commercial disputes with government entities, and the enforcement of settlement agreements when mediation is conducted outside of India.

Read the complete article here

Featured Members

View all

Read these next


Mediation & People With Disabilities

For those who miss the monthly NYC-DR Roundtable Breakfast meetings sponsored by ACRGNY and John Jay College due to schedules (yes, we are all very busy conflict resolvers) or due...

By Jeff Thompson

Decision Making and Taking Decision in Mediation

“Certainty is a cruel mindset. It hardens our mindset against possibility.” ~ Ellen J. Langer Decision making is a process. Taking a decision is an act. In mediation, parties’ right...

By Sarathi Susheela

The Agreement to Conflict

The Agreement to Conflict Within relationships we care about, professional or personal, those we hope will keep-up their stride for the long-run, I am inspired by this tool: a contractual...

By Keren Khaya Abrams