Search Mediators Near You:

Tulsa city councilors unanimously approve mediation process to resolve internal disputes

Tulsa city councilors unanimously approve mediation process to resolve internal disputes

Tulsa’s City Council Rules and Order of Business state in part that councilors “pledge to be reasonable, responsible, positive, receptive and courteous in all their dealings, to devote their time, skills and energies to their elected office, and abide by all reasonable standards regarding conflict of interest and ethics …”

In other words: Can’t we all get along?

For the most part, they do. But after a recent hullabaloo over alleged violations of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, councilors voted on Wednesday to amend their rules to include a process by which disputes should be mediated.

Under the new language, when a dispute arises among councilors regarding the application of rules regulating their conduct, the councilor or councilors asserting the dispute will notify the City Council chairperson or vice chairperson.

“… Who should make a good faith effort to mediate the dispute prior to the filing of any official request, demand, claim, or action, unless the time for filing such request, demand, claim, or action would lapse or be waived by such notice and mediation,” the amendment states.

If the chairperson or vice chairperson are subjects of the dispute, the person alleging the dispute will notify one or two of the next most senior councilors — other than the chairperson or vice chairperson — of the disagreement.

Council Chairwoman Crista Patrick, who was not available for comment Friday, proposed the mediation process at an April 19 committee meeting. Given that the City Council does not have a human resources department, she told her colleagues, she thought it was prudent to establish a process to resolve conflicts “so that we don’t get into a public situation.”

“If the chair and the vice chair are notified immediately, they have the right to call a meeting, have everyone sit down in a room together and talk it out so that there isn’t a lot of hurt feelings or — not to mitigate, or not to cancel out any legal requests, that is not the point — but just so that we have an open dialogue about where everybody is at initially, before it kind of gets out of hand,” Patrick said.

Read the complete article here.

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


Sasia’s Being Nice Rules

Conflicts of Interest Blog by Vivian Scott My massage therapist and his wife, who have become dear friends over the past decade, lost their beautiful, spirited, and wise 25-year old...

By Vivian Scott

Consensus Instrument for Work Relationships

In view of this article’s thematic, which concerns the management of labor conflicts, we will focus in particular on the legal institute of mediation and its effectiveness. Mediation is a...

By Celeida Maria Celentano Laporta

Challenging Neutrality, Examining Privilege And Encouraging Practitioner Self-Reflexivity: A Social Justice Approach To ADR

Unpacking the Mainstream Mediation Model Objectivity, impartiality and the role of “neutral” third-party are deeply valued foundational components of Western mainstream mediation. As such, mainstream conflict resolution practices and methodologies...

By Elli Nagai-Rothe

Find a Mediator