From Stephanie West Allen’s blog Brains on Purpose
Excellent article for anyone interested in legal responsibility. Abstract:
Psychopathy is characterized as an emotional disorder tightly woven with persistent antisocial behavior. Prevailing legal doctrine and social norms hold psychopaths responsible for their conduct and punishment legitimately flows to psychopaths who violate the law. Recent scholarship, however, has challenged that view by claiming the emotional and cognitive deficits inherent in psychopathy should preclude culpability for some psychopaths. This view necessarily imposes a substantial modification on how the law conceptualizes culpability that is ultimately unwise. Legal responsibility entails the capacity for rationality and psychopaths comport with the established meanings of rationality as understood by the law and the communal intuitions which guide it. Extant scholarship indicates psychopaths are rationale agents and can be fairly subjected to punishment for conduct which violates the law. The law should reject efforts to include psychopaths within its excuse jurisprudence.
Click to download "Predators and Punishment" (Psychology, Public Policy, and Law at SSRN).
From Arnold W. Zeman's blogWith today’s launch of Transforming Conflict Through Insight, it is timely to republish an earlier post (October 11, 2008) now that this blog’s readership has grown:...By Arnold W. Zeman
From Lorraine Segal's Conflict Remedy Blog In the U.S., when we walk past someone we don’t know, what do we say? In a crowded urban environment, people tend to ignore...By Lorraine Segal
I. Introduction It cannot be disputed that as the millennium approaches healthcare costs are skyrocketing. In 1965 the nation spent 6 percent of the GNP on healthcare, today the industry...By David T. Caldon