John Paul Lederach’s Preparing for Peace, presents a case for considering how we approach conflict resolution training across cultures. His approach in this book is to draw the reader into considering the objectives and mechanics used to achieving the goals we set forth for training and to also to be open minded in our consideration of conflict; peoples’ cultural resources; and conflict transformation. This is not a “how-to” book on training, but one that encourages leaving the imagination open to endless methodologies of training approaches.
Lederach’s main points are as follows. The first deals with the values and goals we hold as peacemakers. The goals are empowerment and social change, so he values a framework that speaks to this end. The peacemaker must understand and integrate those processes that are culturally appropriate for the training goals to be met. He argues that training processes are not universal and do not apply across the cultural board. What would work in North America would not work in Latin America or Somalia and must be considered not only when crossing ethnic and cultural lines, but also class lines as well.
The second point underscores the relationship between the trainer and the participant. Lederach describes a prescriptive approach to training in which the expertise of the trainer is passed on to the trainee as the correct way, or the elicitive approach in which the trainer acts more like a facilitator who assists the participants to find and create methods of conflict resolution that are based in their own cultural knowledge. Lederach argues that the trainer can employ both techniques of training by choosing elements from each after determining what is appropriate for the group in training.
Third, Lederach believes that culture is based in social knowledge and cannot be “mastered and overcome through technical recipes” (p.120). Culture is a resource for designing models and approaches to conflict resolution. The way to handle conflict lies in the roots of social knowledge and the understandings derived from social knowledge that are implicit and allow people to become explicit in developing strategies and methods of conflict resolution. Lederach believes that when people deal in their own social knowledge about conflict resolution they become creative and through that, empowered with the knowledge that they can do it their way.
Lederach presents the two models of training in their pure forms and then explains that he draws from both for practical purposes. There is value in the expertise that the trainer can bring to the group, but not at the expense of the local cultural resources. Transferring training expertise as an explicit tool is only one among many vehicles that may be used in training groups for peace making.
Another point Lederach makes is that any models used in training should be scrutinized for the “cultural assumptions ” (p. 121) within. Participants should be told that the model is applied to a particular cultural setting and may or may not work in their context. Participants should be able to discuss and critique the model and reject it if it does not apply to their culture and setting, and explore their own cultural knowledge and heritage for the conflict resolution models appropriate in their setting.
Lederach, John Paul. (1995) Preparing for Peace. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Singapore International Arbitration BlogIn Part 4 of our Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots Series, we considered how a properly drafted dispute resolution clause can give parties an appropriate dispute resolution...By Shaun Lee
Larry Susskind reflects on the steps and processes of his current international work of developing a public dispute resolution field as well as discussing supply and demand.By Larry Susskind
In August 2007, two faculty persons traveled to South Africa to establish collaboration in the development of AIDS Online International (AOI), developed by Dr. Jenkins for college students in AIDS...By Judy Rashid, Sharron K. Jenkins