From Lee Jay Bermans’Eye On Conflict Blog
Lindsay Lohan is in trouble again. She’s in trouble with a certain judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court… again. This time, she may have gone too far.
Lohan is stuck in Paris with an allegedly lost/stolen passport and her attorney, Shawn Chapman Holley says Lohan will not be able to appear in court Thursday morning, May 20, as ordered. Lohan’s hearing is to determine whether the actress-singer has complied with the terms of her probation order for her 2007 conviction for driving under the influence. See: “Lawyer: Lindsay Lohan will miss court date“.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marsha Revel extended Lohan’s probation hearing from a year ago in order to allow Lohan to complete her mandated alcohol abuse education. Upon granting Lohan the extension last October, after first issuing a warrant for Lohan’s arrest for failing to comply with the requirements of her sentence, Judge Revel warned Lohan not to “thumb your nose” at the court, saying, “This is the last time we are going to be talking about re-enrolling and doing what you need to do.”
If she fails to appear, she will have violated her parole two times: once for the failure to appear as ordered by the court, and a second time because Lohan was to have completed her alcohol abuse education program by this date, and according to Holly, Lohan has, “been in substantial compliance” but has apparently not been perfect in her ordered attendance.
Upon being notified that Lohan was unable to fly back from the Cannes film festival in time for her hearing, the judge indicated that she expected Lohan to effort all means and expense possible in order to appear. Lohan’s father is expected to appear to plead with the judge to send his daughter back to rehab.
This is when I wish that there was an opportunity for a mediator to intervene in the process. If that were possible, a mediator might first sit with the judge alone and ask her if she was able to allow for the possibility that Lohan’s passport might have actually been stolen. The mediator could ask her if she could be open minded to the possibility of Lohan’s true innocence. And that mediator might ask her what, if anything, Lohan could do to make it better with the judge – what proof would satisfy her, or what apology would trigger her forgiveness. The mediator could remind judge Revel about her choices and about her goals and her moral compass, and about her career and her integrity, all to make sure she is making her ultimate decision with an open mind and with a clear view of all of her important perspectives, rather than out of frustration or indignation.
Then that mediator could sit with Lohan and do the same, asking her if she realizes the gravity of what has happened and whether she can see how this looks on tabloid TV when they show her partying in Cannes and then missing her court date immediately after. The mediator might ask her to consider how the judge would look if she were lenient with Lohan, and ask Lohan how she thought she could take responsibility for her actions in a way that would convey real remorse and contrition. By reminding her of the choices that she has – choices about what to do and how she goes about doing it, and walking her quickly through the likely outcome of each of her choices, the mediator could assist her in focusing on her big picture life goals and help her to avoid focusing just on this hearing and this ruling and miss the forest for the trees.
Individual coaching with each side in an escalating dispute is often helpful to keep them balanced and to try to help them keep their emotions from driving their decision making.
Eventually, a mediator could bring the judge together with Lohan and Holley and let them talk. The judge might want to make it clear to Lohan that she had violated the court’s order and that there were a range of options at the judge’s disposal, including jail time. Lohan would likely try to explain clearly the events that led to her passport’s disappearance and to come armed with a police report about the theft and a copy of the affidavit and request filed with the U.S. Consulate in Paris, and for Lohan to genuflect deeply and sincerely and apologize for putting the court in such a position.
From there, the judge would do as she saw fit. She could find Lohan in contempt of court and order jail time, fines, or rehab, or she could believe her story and proceed with the hearing. But whatever she chose, she would do so having had a sincere dialogue and from a place of being informed. And Lohan, even if ordered to prison for a week or two, would at least feel like she had her opportunity to be heard. But making a rash decision without looking into her eyes and seeking the truth would be unwise.
Thank you – Shirli Kirschner, Air New Zealand, Gerald Raftesath, Cindy Last - and all of the other committee members and conference planners (Lawyers Engaged in ADR (LEADR) Annual Conference,...By Christina S. Merchant
From Stephanie West Allen's blog on Neuroscience and conflict resolution. We are most easily manipulated when we are in our day-to-day daze, sleepwalking through life. The level of awareness, and...By Stephanie West Allen
HR Mediator Blog by John Ford Finally discover how to quantify the direct and hidden Costs of Conflict Read below and determine how to use the Cost of Conflict Calculator. Measuring Conflict...By John Ford