Find Mediators Near You:

ADR in the Regulation of Aged Care

From ADRAC- The Australian Dispute Resolution Advisory Council Blog, organized with Shirli Kirschner 


The role of ADR in the aged care sector has a chequered history with regulatory bodies and dispute resolution processes frequently changing in response to public concerns and budgetary considerations. The rate of change in this sector is rapid. In the last ten years there have been three different schemes aimed at resolving complaints and three different manifestations of a Commissioner. The industry’s reliance on ADR processes, such as mediation, has varied significantly with each change.


The introduction of the Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) brought together the two separate services of hostels (concerned with accommodation) and nursing homes (concerned with healthcare) into a new institutional space.1 The reforms also moved the aged care sector towards more of a market based system where users were perceived as ‘consumers’.2

The reform was introduced in the Aged Care Complaints Resolution Scheme (CRS) as an ADR service run by the Department of Health. The CRS engaged external mediators to conduct mediations between parties if an initial negotiation conducted by the CRS failed to reach an outcome.

A 2000 Commonwealth Ombudsman’s report found significant issues with the CRS’s complaints resolutions process.3On the use of mediation, the Ombudsman found a ‘lack of specific guidance on mediation’ and a ‘lack of training for staff of Scheme’.4

Amendments to the Act in 2000 saw the appointment of an independent Commissioner for Complaints to oversee the complaints process.

In 2007, following a series of highly publicised controversies, the Howard Government introduced a series of reforms including the creation of the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme (CIS) replacing the CRS.5 The new scheme provided departmental officers with greater powers to investigate service provider’s compliance with their obligations. The changes were in response to criticism levelled at CRS for its ineffectiveness at resolving disputes including too much reliance on mediation.6 In a press release, the Minister said the following on the changes:

The government has moved to significantly strengthen the complaints handling powers available under the Aged Care Act 1997 by introducing the capacity to investigate complaints, as opposed to the former conflict resolution role that relied on mediation. Some complaints are just unamenable to mediation.

The changes also created the Aged Care Commissioner, an office which replaced the Commissioner for Complaints.

The next overhaul of the complaints resolution system occurred in 2009 following the review of the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme conducted by Prof. Merrilyn Walton (the Walton Report). The Aged Care Complaints Scheme was introduced to replace the CIS. The new scheme was designed to focus on the resolution of complaints rather than the investigation of providers’ compliance with regulations.7

Then, in 2016, the Commonwealth established the Aged Care Complaints Commissioner. This new body removed the complaints resolution process from the Aged Care Complaints Resolution Scheme. In explaining the reforms, the Minister said that the change was to facilitate the recommendations of the Walton Report.8 It was considered that the Commissioner, being an independent office-holder from the Department, would be better placed to resolved disputes between complainants, Aged Care providers, and the Department.9

ADR and the Aged Care Complaints Commissioner

The Commissioner has four options of dispute resolution available. These are conciliation, provider resolution, mediation and investigation. Conciliation and mediation are examined here.


The Commissioner’s policy document describes conciliation as involving:

…complaints officers assisting the parties to work together to discuss the issues and reach agreement. This could be achieved by phone discussion or through meetings between the parties.10

The document states that issues are suitable for conciliation if (i) the participants are “willing and able” to participate, (ii) the participants agree to the Commissioner’s assistance in the process, and (iii) an outcome is likely to achieve a timely and positive outcome. The policy stresses that the process is not legal and it is not appropriate for parties to have legal representatives attend the conciliation.


If the Commissioner believes that mediation is appropriate in the circumstances a recommendation may be made that the parties engage an independent mediator at their own expense. On agreement of the parties to engage a mediator, the Commissioner will end involvement in the dispute. However, involvement of the Commissioner may be reengaged if the mediation fails to resolve the dispute. As the mediation engages a third party provider, the Commissioner’s policy has limited detail surrounding the process.


The use of ADR in resolving disputes within the Aged Care Sector has changed significantly with the various legislative schemes. It appears that dispute resolution in this space has been a politically sensitive area with different approaches and attitudes towards ADR with each reform. With dispute resolution now located within an independent body, ADRAC will be interested to follow the extent of the use of ADR in the aged care sector over the coming years.

The topic of DR, older people and Elder Mediation is dealt with here.

1. J Angus and R Nay, ‘The Paradox of the Aged Care Act 1997: The Marginalisation of Nursing Discourse’ (2003) 10.2 Nursing Inquiry130.?
2. Ibid, 131. ?
3. Commonwealth Ombudsman, Report of an Own Motion Investigation into the Department of Health and Aged Care’s Complaints Resolution Scheme, July 2000
4. Ibid, 12. ?
5. Peter Condliffe, ‘Resolving Aged Care Disputes’ (2007) Law Institute of Victoria, 3.
6. National Seniors Australia – Submission to Complaints Investigation Scheme Review, August 2009.
7. The Auditor-General, Managing Aged Care Complaints, Audit Report No.10 2012–13,
8. Minister for Health, ‘New Aged Care Complaints Commissioner Gets to Work’ (Press Release, 3 January 2016).
9. Ibid. ?
10. Aged Care Complaints Commissioner, ‘Guidelines for the Aged Care Complaints Commissioner’ (Commonwealth of Australia, 2016)


Shirli Kirschner

Shirli Kirschner has been a qualified mediator for 12 years and is the principal of Resolve Advisors Pty Ltd, which she established in August 1996. Resolve provides mediation, facilitation and ADR and system design services to a wide client base. Shirli is on a number of mediator panels including the LEADR… MORE >

Featured Members

View all

Read these next


1992 Watts Gang Truce

There are multiple instances where there is conflict without resolution. For instance, when talking about topics such as religion it is possible for values to be deeply ingrained to the...

By Hailee Mingo

Harvey Hostage Negotiator’s Inside Look at Standoff

In an ABC7 exclusive, a key hostage negotiator gave Eyewitness News an inside look at how he and others helped bring that suburban standoff in Harvey to a peaceful end....

By Jeff Thompson

Arbitrating Antitrust Claims: From Suspicion to Trust

Disputing Blog by Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, and Holly HayesVera Korzun, Adjunct Professor at the Fordham University School of Law, has authored “Arbitrating Antitrust Claims: From Suspicion to Trust,” New...

By Beth Graham