Find Mediators Near You:

Business Gurus Bet on Women

Now that the Paycheck Fairness Act has been blocked by the GOP, sending federal funding for women’s negotiation training to the dust bin, bargaining experts are out in force advising women on best negotiation practices.

There’s no one more famous for popularizing the collaborative, interest-based negotiation we teach at She Negotiates than Harvard’s William Ury, co-author of the ground-breaking Getting to Yes and author of the more recent Power of a Positive No.

Male and Female Negotiation Styles – is it Better to be Cruel or Kind?

In a lengthy interview at the Huffington Post – Fearless Negotiation – Ury places his bet on women’s natural relational negotiation style as the “winning” bargaining strategy for the future.

Women, says Ury, have a bargaining advantage because they’re “more tuned to relationships.” That’s a strength in an economy that is discarding its old top-down pyramid structure and replacing it with loose, horizontal structures that depend on the maintenance of good on-going relationships.

“Men,” says Ury,

have more of a tendency to treat negotiation like a transaction where one side wins and the other side loses. It has its place in certain negotiations, but it’s increasingly less relevant than a relational approach, where you look for solutions that work for both sides.

Practicing “harsh, ruthless, win-lose negotiation” is a recipe for failure in a system that is increasingly dependent on people working together because they want to. Although men might “win” one negotiation with a take no prisoner’s attitude, their bargaining partners will find someone else to work with in the future – someone who is capable of being “soft on the people and hard on the problem.”

“Right now,” Ury mused,

I would say that asking the traditional question of, “Who’s winning this negotiation?” is more and more like asking the question, “Who’s winning this marriage?” If you’re asking that question, your marriage is in serious difficulty!

Do We Need Legislation? It Would Have Helped, But We’re Good to Go Without It

When I’m asked about the failure of the Paycheck Fairness Act, I tend to react more calmly than I often do when it comes to the GOP defeating legislation benefitting women or promoting laws that are detrimental to us.

Sure, it would be great if we could legislate greater transparency in compensation and let loose with a little federal money to get women the negotiation training they so badly need.

On the other hand, there are plenty of people out there right now with the knowledge, skill and wisdom necessary to teach what Ury’s been teaching for a quarter of a century – interest-based, relationship enhancing, collaborative negotiation.

                        author

Victoria Pynchon

Attorney-mediator Victoria Pynchon is a panelist with ADR Services, Inc. Ms. Pynchon was awarded her LL.M Degree in Dispute Resolution from the Straus Institute in May of 2006, after 25 years of complex commercial litigation practice, with sub-specialties in intellectual property, securities fraud, antitrust, insurance coverage, consumer class actions and all… MORE >

Featured Members

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Teaching Students to Think Like Practitioners

Indisputably People often say that dispute resolution processes aren’t “one size fits all.”  When practitioners are asked to opine about hypothetical problems, they often say “it depends” and they make...

By John Lande
Category

Enhancing Communication

Quality mediation courses include communication skills that enable the mediator to more effectively draw out information, which is necessary, if the parties are to negotiate a settlement. After all, mediation...

By Nancy Neal Yeend
Category

3 Things that Mediation is NOT

3 Things that Mediation is NOT Mediation has become a popular alternative to court proceedings, with mediators resolving disputes of all kinds ranging from private family matters to the very...

By Justin Kelsey
×