Find Mediators Near You:

California Confidentiality Will End Unless You Take Action Now!

California Confidentiality Will End Unless You Take Action Now!

Are you willing to invest just a few minutes to help save mediation confidentiality?
PLEASE forward this alert.

What Happened?

On August 7, 2015 the California Law Revision Commission voted 4-1 to draft a recommendation removing our current protections. Nearly all its recommendations become law.

The legislation will remove current protections whenever a mediation party alleges misconduct by their lawyer advocate or lawyer mediator.

3 Ways This Law Will Destroy Mediation and Swamp Our Overburdened Courts

Predictability Destroyed – Candor Dangerous. Our current predictable protections will disappear with a mere allegation of misconduct. Few will risk being candid knowing every mediation statement and document can be discovered and become admissible evidence.

Follow-On Subpoenas and Depositions for All Participants. Under this law, anyone suing a lawyer and also the accused lawyer can depose all mediation participants and subpoena their mediation documents searching for relevant evidence.

Access to Justice Threatened. Our budget-starved courts rely on confidential mediation to resolve a large part of their pending civil cases. The added court workload of unresolved cases and the new load of follow-on mediation lawsuits and discovery fights will further clog many struggling civil divisions.

Commission Chair’s Warning

The Chair argued against the direction the Commision voted to take, and warned:

“I’ve thought about this a very long time…I am persuaded that our courts would be devastated…every unsatisfied party will try to craft what happened at the mediation to fit that exception, try to unwind the mediation, try to disclose something confidential…I see the caseload of the courts increasing…” (emphasis added)

What Can You Do?

PLEASE email the Law Revision Commission now at bgaal(at)clrc.ca.gov while there is still time to reverse the decision. Tell them they’re going the wrong direction. Please cc me at ronkelly(at)ronkelly.com, and please forward this alert to anyone who uses or conducts mediation. They should know about this vote before it’s too late.

Please copy and send the brief statement below – or better, write your own. Please also urge any group you’re in to adopt and convey a similar opposition statement as soon as possible.

Thank you,
Ron Kelly

** ** ** **
California Law Revision Commission
c/o Ms. Barbara Gaal, Chief Deputy Counsel

Re Study K-402

I oppose the Commission’s August 7th decision to draft recommended legislation removing our current confidentiality protections when a mediation participant alleges lawyer misconduct. I will oppose this legislation if it goes to the Legislature and will urge organizations of which I’m a member to oppose it.

For thirty years our current right to choose confidential mediation and also to opt out of it has served the people and courts of California extremely well. Removing this right is a very radical change which should require solid evidence establishing a need. Dozens of alternative solutions have been suggested to the Commission to address the alleged problem without removing our confidentiality protections. I request you pursue these instead.

I urge you not to turn your back on the Commission’s own 1996 statement recommending our current statutory protections be enacted – “All persons attending a mediation, parties as well as nonparties, should be able to speak frankly, without fear of having their words turned against them.”

                        author

Ron Kelly - Arbitrator, Mediator, Trainer

Mediating since 1970 and arbitrating since 1986, Ron has initiated and guided enactment of dozens of key sections of California law protecting the integrity of ADR. He's a founder of two of California's main ADR professional organizations. He's been honored with eight major awards for his pioneering work in building… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Time to Think About Jurisdiction and Look to Scotland

Amid all the coverage of the politics of Brexit, it’s understandable little is said about the importance of EU law as the source of the rules regarding which state's courts...

By Jim Cormack
Category

Pearlstein, Arthur: Directly Supplying ADR Providers for Market’s Demand – Video

Arthur Pearlstein describes how the Werner Institute prepares students to meet the market's demands for dispute resolution.

By Arthur Pearlstein
Category

Self-Determination: How Mediator’s Goals Put it in Jeopardy

What a mediator aims to accomplish in the mediation impacts how the mediator acts and how parties experience the mediation. A recent mediation I did in Summary Process court, where...

By Tessa Tompkins Byer
×