Find Mediators Near You:

Check That Impulse! Be A Dispassionate Mediator

Confession is good for the soul, they say, so here goes mine. . .

I recently conducted a mediation involving injuries to a teenager. The case settled, so my conscience should be clear. However, during the process I fell into the trap of letting impulse overrule reason. I never received a complaint, and both sides left the proceeding happy (or at least equally unhappy, as mediators are prone to predict) but my conscience told me afterward I had slipped, with the best of intentions, but slipped nonetheless.

The young lady had a not very visible scar on her upper lip, purportedly caused by an auto accident, liability for which was attributed to the insured defendant. Fairly routine case, as auto accident cases go.

During opening statements, plaintiff’s counsel presented a persuasive and well reasoned argument in his client’s behalf, emphasizing in particular the serious and permanent nature of the scar on her upper lip. He described the scar as “ugly.” When he did, I instinctively looked at her. Mary [not her real name] was a very attractive young lady, 16-years old, and I wondered what her silent reaction was to his reference to this lifetime defect to her beauty.

It was during the first caucus with plaintiff and her counsel that I expressed the inappropriate comment, stemming from a purely emotional response to the attorney’s characterization of her injury:

“Mary, I have to tell you you are pretty enough not to have to worry about your social life with that scar. I can barely notice it.”


Now, Mary’s counsel may well have prepared her, for purposes of her claim, for some hyperbole in his description of the scar, but I did not think about that at the moment. In the eyes of her attorney, and possibly to her mother who was present, it probably seemed this mediator had diminished, at least in his own mind, the value of Mary’s claim, and, perhaps, was not as impartial as he had assured everyone at the outset he would be.

In fact, I was and remained impartial during the duration of the proceeding—the other side certainly never enjoyed the benefit of my comment—but perception, as we well know, can sometimes override reality.

A lesson learned. Mediators can and should empathize, but they must remain dispassionate and check the emotional, albeit natural, impulse.


Edward P. Ahrens

Ed Ahrens has been a member of the Florida Bar for over 43 years. He is a certified state and federal court mediator in Tampa, Florida. He is also a freelance writer and former president of National Writers Association, South Florida Chapter. He is the author of the popular book,… MORE >

Featured Members

View all

Read these next


The Hidden Costs of Workplace Conflict

Conflict is an inevitable aspect of any organization’s existence.  As Dr. Dan Dana of the Dana Mediation Institute points out, workplace conflict follows a predictable, retaliatory path when two or...

By Steve McGuire

Colorado Ethics Committee Concludes Collaborative Law Per Se Unethical, Cooperative Law Not

\As previously posted in EngagingConflicts here, there is a significant ethical critique of Collaborative Law, and a growing movement for the practice of Cooperative Law. The main issue is Collaborative...

By Gini Nelson

Operations Management Approach To Conflict in Organizations

From the Disputing Blog of Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, and Holly Hayes.Last week, I had the opportunity to attend the University of Texas “Innovation in Health Care Delivery Systems: Maintaining...

By Holly Hayes