Find Mediators Near You:

Check That Impulse! Be A Dispassionate Mediator

Confession is good for the soul, they say, so here goes mine. . .

I recently conducted a mediation involving injuries to a teenager. The case settled, so my conscience should be clear. However, during the process I fell into the trap of letting impulse overrule reason. I never received a complaint, and both sides left the proceeding happy (or at least equally unhappy, as mediators are prone to predict) but my conscience told me afterward I had slipped, with the best of intentions, but slipped nonetheless.

The young lady had a not very visible scar on her upper lip, purportedly caused by an auto accident, liability for which was attributed to the insured defendant. Fairly routine case, as auto accident cases go.

During opening statements, plaintiff’s counsel presented a persuasive and well reasoned argument in his client’s behalf, emphasizing in particular the serious and permanent nature of the scar on her upper lip. He described the scar as “ugly.” When he did, I instinctively looked at her. Mary [not her real name] was a very attractive young lady, 16-years old, and I wondered what her silent reaction was to his reference to this lifetime defect to her beauty.

It was during the first caucus with plaintiff and her counsel that I expressed the inappropriate comment, stemming from a purely emotional response to the attorney’s characterization of her injury:

“Mary, I have to tell you you are pretty enough not to have to worry about your social life with that scar. I can barely notice it.”


Now, Mary’s counsel may well have prepared her, for purposes of her claim, for some hyperbole in his description of the scar, but I did not think about that at the moment. In the eyes of her attorney, and possibly to her mother who was present, it probably seemed this mediator had diminished, at least in his own mind, the value of Mary’s claim, and, perhaps, was not as impartial as he had assured everyone at the outset he would be.

In fact, I was and remained impartial during the duration of the proceeding—the other side certainly never enjoyed the benefit of my comment—but perception, as we well know, can sometimes override reality.

A lesson learned. Mediators can and should empathize, but they must remain dispassionate and check the emotional, albeit natural, impulse.


Edward P. Ahrens

Ed Ahrens has been a member of the Florida Bar for over 43 years. He is a certified state and federal court mediator in Tampa, Florida. He is also a freelance writer and former president of National Writers Association, South Florida Chapter. He is the author of the popular book,… MORE >

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


Alternative Environmental Dispute Resolution in South Carolina:Emerging Opportunities to Build More Sustainable Communities

Funded by the South Carolina Sustainable Universities InitiativeIntroduction Amidst all of the recent dialogue in South Carolina over sustainable communities resonates a concept that is arguably the cornerstone of nature,...

By Sean Blacklocke

Building Bridges Through Negotiation

Re-published with permission from Program for Community Problem Solving (PCPS) a division of the National Civic League.In September of this year, a team of stakeholders in Garrett County, Maryland started...

By William R. Potapchuk

Free Mediation, Revisited

The prospect of elimination of all ADR administration by the the Los Angeles County Superior Court, discussed in a previous post, seems about to touch off another debate about pro...

By Joe Markowitz