The events of September
11 have raised legitimate concerns about justice and security. Many
people are demanding some form of response to punish or otherwise mete
out justice to the perpetrators. All of us want some reassurances that
we will not have to live in constant fear of violence and terror.
Given our reliance
as a nation on a war metaphor for describing many difficult situations
(e.g., war on poverty, war on drugs, war on crime), it is natural that
we would talk of our current situation as a state of war, even if we
do not envision an immediate massive counter-attack. Nevertheless, this
metaphor should be used with great caution.
are criminal acts.
have no evidence that those who perpetrated them are rulers of a
state or nation.
they do not appear to fall into the category of revolutionaries
– i.e., representatives of a disenfranchised identity group seeking
representation within a state or nation.
have yet to fight successfully a “war to end all wars”
and this will be no exception.
perpetrators of this horror are not clearly identifiable, cannot
be located easily, and probably cannot be attacked successfully
using military means.
attacks on any nation that harbors the criminals responsible for
these atrocities will create thousands of refugees; refugee camps
have been the breeding ground for suicide bombers. Thus, we will
only perpetuate the cycle of fear and terror for our children and
assume that we understand what motivates the “enemy others”
and that we can predict their responses to our military actions.
fail to examine and address the conditions and policies that have
given rise to the cycles of unrest, violence, and terror that have
been escalating around the world and that on September 11, 2001
entered the previously “safe space” of our nation.
we bomb innocent people in retaliation, we commit the same atrocity
that we saw on September 11.
are granted rights that enemies in war are denied.
we fail to invoke the national and international laws that apply
to criminal acts, we undercut the rule of law and weaken the sources
of our own long-term protection.
JAMS ADR Blog by Chris PooleMost disputes in litigation involve a procedural phase for the preparation and exchange of expert reports and the interrogation of the experts’ opinions. In environmental...By Lester Levy