I pride myself on settling cases. Most of the time, somewhere near the beginning of the mediation hearing, I explain to the parties that what we’re after is a “compromise”, not a win. Most of the time, they’re satisfied with the outcome: it ends the lawsuit and usually resembles what is legally “right” or at least justifiable financially. And yet, when you “google” the word “settlements” you get a lot of images of uninvited housing developments in lands whose ownership is still under dispute. Does “settlement” also mean something like “staking out your claim”? Or consider the “settling” that takes place in so many homes in Southern California. That one causes cracks in our ceilings and walls after earthquakes have caused our foundation to tremble over so many years. Is that a good thing? What about “debt settlement”? That one gives relief to the debtor, so probably is analogous to the kind of settling I do for parties before me. And consider “settling down” as in making peace with your current situation. It appears to be subject to one’s interpretation in ways that make my job that much more challenging. Do I dare to urge the parties to “settle” their lawsuit or is it useful to consider other terminology in light of the various meanings attached to the word?
1. The court that is to hear the case is likely to order mediation and you would rather pick your own mediator and set your own times and dates. Comment:...By Jeffrey Krivis
Introduction The fact that thousands of businesses fail each year,(2) and that most small business fail within their first few years(3) should serve as a warning for mediators currently in...By Managing Editor
The Internet is a wonderful thing…when it works. Early on, finding anything I wanted on the internet seemed like a miracle. Curious about blogs. Search blogs and up pops articles...By Dina Beach Lynch