In Fair v. Bakhtiari, 19 Cal.Rptr.3d 591 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) the appellate course reversed the trial court’s refusal to enforce a mediated settlement and compel arbitration pursuant to its terms because inclusion of the arbitration provision in the settlement was “consistent solely with an intention on the part of the parties for the settlement terms document to be enforceable or binding,” thereby making the settlement admissible based on a statutory exception to inadmissibility where an “agreement provides that it is enforceable or binding or words to that effect.”
For the past decade, as part of the annual Minnesota State Bar Association ADR Institute, Hamline Professor James Coben has been producing short videos illustrating mediation litigation. Mediate.com is proud to now assist in the further distribution of these exceptional teaching and learning resources.
This enactment may portray “less than optimal” mediator performance. Rest assured that you are not at risk by hiring any of the ADR Institute Players as neutrals (or lawyers), despite what you see on the tape. The videos are fictional reenactments of the mediations underlying the published litigated cases.
The Creative Solution Table of Contents Summary: This chapter describes the complexities of co-parenting during the holidays, using his own experience of navigating multiple family visits on Christmas Day as...
By Chip RoseDispute Settlement Counselby Michael Zeytoonian. Family business succession can be joyous when there is a succession plan. But when there’s no plan in place, it can be anything but joyous....
By Michael A. ZeytoonianIf you’ve recently divorced and see the holidays coming fast, planning ahead will make certain things will go smoothly for you and your children. It’s important to anticipate problems and...
By Jeff Murphy