Continuing the series on DR in Second Life…
The people behind Second Life, Linden Lab, have announced today that from hereon in a dispute resolution known as “binding non-appearance-based arbitration” is available for disputes of less than $10,000.00 between Linden Lab and the Residents in Second Life.
They describe it as “… a legally binding procedure administered by a private organization. This means that the arbitrator’s opinion on liability and damages may be entered as a final, binding judgment in a court of law. The arbitrator will conduct the arbitration by telephone, online, or based on written submissions, and the Resident and Linden Lab will not make any in-person appearance at the arbitration hearing”
That does not, of course, help with the 2,000 reports of some sort of problem between residents that Linden Lab recieves every day.
“… Linden Lab received a grand total of 43 Abuse Reports during my first week of work in 2003. Jumping forward to the end of 2006, the number is closer to 2,000 per day.
On a purely clerical level, this kind of volume is not readily sustainable; to give each report five minutes of investigation and attention would add up to more than 160 hours day.
It could be done of course, but the bigger issue lies in the content of the Reports; the vast majority are either: problems Linden Lab cannot resolve (we can’t force anyone to see eye to eye with anyone else), situations Linden Lab should not resolve (neighborly property line disputes or transactional issues), and reports that aren’t Abuse Reports at all – they don’t have anything to do with the Community Standards and belong in other communications channels”
From Of Seeds and Sowers, NAICR's distinguished newsletter that includes current programs, projects and tele-classes, as well as humor and inspiration. Visit the site to learn more about the work...By Barbara Ashley Phillips
From the Blog of Phyllis G. Pollack. I am in the business of resolving disputes – a “peacemaker” – as many of my colleagues would say. I was reading an...By Phyllis Pollack
In 1925, a visionary, Mary Parker Follet, identified three ways to make decisions and resolve controversies: domination, compromise and integration. Domination uses force, manipulation and deception. It requires the victory...By Jacques Joubert