Find Mediators Near You:

Germany’s Cannabis Legislation Heads Towards Mediation

Germany’s Cannabis Legislation Heads Towards Mediation

Three Takeaways on Germany:

  1. Germany’s proposed cannabis legislation might be reviewed by a mediation committee, impacting its implementation timeline.
  2. State justice and health departments in Germany recommend mediation to address concerns in the current cannabis legislation.
  3. Proposals aim to adjust cannabis legislation in Germany, focusing on decriminalization delays and consumption regulations.

According to the German Legal Tribune Germany’s journey towards implementing its proposed cannabis legislation has entered a more convoluted phase, with the prospect of a mediation committee referral looming large. This development arises from recommendations by state-level justice and health departments, suggesting a comprehensive review of the legislation to postpone its execution and mitigate pressures on the judicial system.

The Bundesrat’s Legal and Health Committees in Germany have outlined potential areas for the Cannabis Control Act’s (CanG) examination through mediation. The decision to proceed with this during the Bundesrat’s session on March 22 is pending. However, the recommendations set forth by these committees, awaiting the chamber’s vote, could foreshadow the Bundesrat’s inclination.

Diverse proposals have surfaced in Germany, targeting amendments or the total revocation of the contentious CanG. Notably, an extreme suggestion for its complete withdrawal did not secure a majority in either committee, showcasing the complexity of achieving consensus on this issue.

The Health Committee in Germany, swayed by proposals from Saxony’s Social Democratic-led health department and initiated by State Minister Petra Köpping (SPD), advocated for postponing the CanG’s implementation. These proposals seek not only to delay decriminalization but also to refine regulations concerning allowable possession limits and consumption near youth facilities, emphasizing a tailored mediation process.

Furthermore, Karl-Josef Laumann (CDU), North Rhine-Westphalia’s Health Minister in Germany, proposed deferring the CanG’s effect until October 1, 2024, underscoring the need for enhanced prevention strategies. This proposition found support predominantly among Union and SPD members.

The Legal Committee in Germany favored three motions aimed at alleviating burdens on the criminal justice system. A notable proposition from Baden-Württemberg’s CDU-led Justice Department to discard a retroactive amnesty clause received a majority, addressing law enforcement’s concerns over the arduous review process it necessitates.

In the event of the primary recommendation’s failure, a contingency proposal from North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony gained unanimous support among the Justice Departments. This measure advocates for postponing the contentious amnesty provision, highlighting the legislative nuances being navigated.

Read the complete article here.

Featured Members

View all

Read these next


Distinguishing Between Compromising and Collaborating

People often ask me to clarify the difference between compromising and collaborating, especially since these two modes involve both people getting their needs met. In particular, people often use the...

By Ralph Kilmann

1st Key-Leadership: Adopt The Edinburgh Declaration

Editorial Note: has published a series of peer reviewed articles and videos under the collective title Seven Keys to Unlock Mediation’s Golden Age. The objective of the Seven Keys is to encourage...

By John Sturrock

Pay Mediators From the Get-go

This article is reprinted, with permission, from the June 26, 2006 issue of the New Jersey Law Journal. © 2006, ALM Properties. Further publication, without permission, is prohibited. All rights...

By Anju Jessani