Mediation is a process that falls under the umbrella of so-called “alternative dispute resolution,” along with arbitration and a few more esoteric processes. The term “alternative dispute resolution” begs the question — alternative to what? The answer is traditional litigation, typically a civil lawsuit filed in court and ultimately decided by a jury. Most people outside of lawyers in practice areas that frequently use mediation have a limited understanding of the process. If you Google the word “mediation,” you’ll find as many articles about meditation as mediation. This article will cover the basics of mediation, particularly in the area of employment disputes, and will provide five reasons why anyone who finds themselves in such litigation — as a plaintiff or defendant — should seriously consider mediation.
Mediation is a negotiation between two or more parties facilitated by an agreed-upon neutral third party (the mediator). This is distinguishable from arbitration, where two or more parties engage a neutral third party to hear and decide a case, essentially acting as a private judge and jury. Unlike arbitration, mediation is not binding and only results in a settlement if both parties agree; either party is free to walk away from the negotiation at any time. In the United States, mediation became popular in labor disputes in the 20th century and later became prevalent in specific legal areas such as divorce and child custody. In the past 20 years, mediation has steadily gained popularity in the civil litigation arena, which includes employment litigation.
As for process, mediation is flexible, but there are some typical practices that parties can expect. In most cases, the parties must agree to go to mediation, although some courts have their own mediation programs that are essentially mandatory. Even in those instances, however, reaching a settlement is not mandatory. Once mediation is agreed upon, the parties jointly choose a mediator. The default position in most mediations is that the parties will split the cost, although other arrangements are permissible. Once selected, the mediator typically has some pre-mediation interaction with the attorneys for the parties. It is also common practice for parties to file pre-mediation briefs before the scheduled session. A mediation session typically lasts a day or a half-day, but that may be modified by the parties. In recent years, mediation has become much more flexible. Prior to 2020, most mediations were conducted in person, but with COVID-19 restrictions, mediation adapted and remote mediation via Zoom and similar platforms are now routine.
The three primary styles of mediation are facilitative, transformative and evaluative.
Facilitative mediation is the most traditional form and involves a mediator “facilitating” negotiation between the parties by exploring the parties’ interests and encouraging them to reach their own voluntary solution. Mediators using this style focus on process and avoid conveying their own opinions about the dispute.
Transformative mediation is a relative newcomer to the world of mediation. The focus of transformative mediation is to assist the parties with recognizing the interests and needs of the other parties with less emphasis on the final outcome than other forms of mediation.
Evaluative mediators are likely to express opinions about the dispute. Instead of focusing primarily on interests and process, evaluative mediators help parties assess the legal merits of their arguments and likely outcomes of litigation. Evaluative mediation is common in the legal world, and evaluative mediators are often attorneys who have expertise in the specific area applicable to the dispute, such as employment law.
The above distinctions are somewhat artificial because good mediators will employ a combination of styles in a mediation session as the needs of the parties and various issues in play dictate.
1. Mediation saves time. The courts are still backed up from COVID-19, with trial dates often set 12 to 18 months after a case is initially filed. That is a long time to wait for a resolution, and litigation is usually a source of stress and distraction for the parties. Add to that the fact that in most cases the initial lawsuit is just round one — let’s not forget about appeals. Employment disputes, for example, can drag on for years. Moreover, witnesses and parties will find themselves burdened by demands to locate documents, respond to questions, prepare for and give testimony and other tasks that distract from business and personal obligations. Mediation typically takes one day and can resolve a case that could otherwise take years.
2. Mediation saves money. Most defense attorneys bill their clients by the hour, and the basic tasks involved in any lawsuit — drafting pleadings, discovery and motion practice — are time consuming and expensive. Many plaintiff’s attorneys enter into contingency fee arrangements with their clients, meaning they only get some percentage of what they recover; of course, they hope to recover enough to compensate them adequately for the time they put into a case. Both plaintiffs and defendants may have to cover litigation expenses, such as filing fees, court reporter fees, copying costs and expert witness fees. These kinds of expenses are necessary and can be substantial. In many cases, the longer the litigation goes on and the more fees and expenses are incurred, the less likely a case is to settle. At some point, the parties pass the point of no return having invested so much in a case that neither side is willing to walk away.
Mediation, particularly when it occurs relatively early in a case, can save both sides a substantial amount of money. While the parties do have to cover the cost of mediation, this is usually not prohibitive when compared to the cost of litigating a case through trial and appeals.
Read the complete article here.
Barbara McAdoo shares her disappointment with how the field has not been defined and how mediators cannot communicate what mediation is to consumers.By Barbara McAdoo