Find Mediators Near You:

ODR and E-Commerce

This chapter is from “Online Dispute Resolution
Theory and Practice,” Mohamed Abdel Wahab, Ethan Katsh & Daniel Rainey ( Eds.), published, sold and distributed by Eleven International Publishing.
The Hague, Netherlands at: www.elevenpub.com
.

The Internet is a powerful technology that enables fast communication, both internationally and locally, and changes behaviors that involve the use and processing of information. Cyberspace, as a consequence, has become a new realm of commerce and a market with various kinds of transactions using acronyms such as: C2C, B2C, B2B, C2B or M2B.

The Internet removes traditional barriers between “offerors” (producers, sellers, etc) and “offerees”
(clients, users, consumers.). Time, geographical distance and language are no longer obstacles to trade and, consequently, cross border disputes have also increased.

In this environment, courts have been losing effectiveness in handling the needs of parties because costs are too disproportionate and proceedings long and cumbersome. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanisms have emerged, therefore, as a natural response to this
international process with the aim of providing an effective way to overcome the existing gap.

The European Union Communication from the Commission on The Out-of-Court Settlement of Consumer Disputes of 1998
clarified the scope of challenges consumers face. In
brief, it recognized that there are three possible ways of improving access to justice:

(i) simplification and improvement of legal procedures,
(ii) improvement of communication
between professionals and consumers,
(iii) and the use of out-of-court procedures to settle
consumer disputes. Most importantly, it indicated that “far from being alternatives, these
three approaches are fully complementary”.

However, a fundamental difference distinguishes the first approach from the other two. While the first approach remains within
the traditional framework of the judicial settlement of disputes and aims to improve the
existing systems, the other two remove these disputes from the judicial arena wherever
possible. This approach can assist us in drawing the initial boundaries of ADR/ODR
methods.

Attachments to this Article

                        author

Aura Esther Vilalta

Aura Esther Vilalta is a Senior lecturer at Faculty of Law, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), researcher at the Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), associate lecturer at Ramon Llull University (ESADE) and spanish national representative at the United Nations, Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution), UNCITRAL. Vilalta teaches civil law, commercial… MORE >

Featured Members

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Peter Adler: Background and Early Training in Hawaii – Video

Peter Adler describes his entry into the mediaton field and the background training he had from an outward bound program in Hawaii, learning a native practice called "Ho'oponopono".

By Peter Adler
Category

Colonialism, Crime, and Dispute Resolution: A Critical Analysis of Canada’s Aboriginal Justice Strategy

Winning Essay in the Graduate Student Category2002 James Boskey ADR Writing Competition. The competition is Sponsored by the ABA Section of Dispute Resolution and the Association for Conflict Resolution. INTRODUCTION...

By Jessie Sutherland
Category

Rewriting Your Conflict Story

During recess in elementary school, I was playing pickle with some friends at the side of a baseball diamond. We were in our own little world; trapping people between the...

By Jason Dykstra
×