Find Mediators Near You:

Sample Mediation Ground Rules

Mediators often assist participants to identify guidelines or ground rules to help support productive communications. Here are some sample mediation ground rules participants may want to consider adopting.

Gentle reminders from the mediator. e.g., “Didn’t you agree to not interrupt?” are usually sufficient to stay on track.

In the event that discussions are problematic, the mediator can also do a more generalized “relevancy check,” asking, “how is this discussion taking us where we want to go . . . as, if it is not, perhaps we can make new progress by . . .” The “relevancy check” is a transition technique between that which is not working and that which might work.

Here are sample suggested ground rules for mediation participants:

1. We agree to take turns speaking and to try to not interrupt each other.

2. We agree to call each other by our first names, not “he” or “she” or worse.

3. We will ask questions of each other for the purposes of gaining clarity and understanding and not as attacks.

4. We agree to try to avoid establishing hard positions and express ourselves in terms of our needs and desires and the outcomes that we wish to create.

5. We agree to listen respectfully and sincerely try to understand the other’s needs and interests.

6. We recognize that, even if we do not agree with it, each of us is entitled to our own perspective.

7. We will seek to avoid dwelling on things that did not work in the past, and instead focus on the future we want to create.

8. We agree to make a conscious, sincere effort to refrain from unproductive arguing, venting, and narration and agree to use our time in mediation to work toward what we perceive to be our most constructive agreement possible.

9. We will speak up if something is not working for us in the mediation.

10. We will request a break if helpful.

11. While in mediation, we will refrain from furthering adversarial legal proceedings, except in the case of an emergency necessitating such action.

12. We will point out if we feel the mediator is not impartial as to person and neutral as to result.

© 1996-2018 Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc. – All Rights Reserved

                        author

Jim Melamed

Jim Melamed co-founded Mediate.com in 1996 along with John Helie and served as CEO of Mediate.com through June 2020 (25 years).  Jim is currently General Counsel for Mediate.com and ODR.com. During Jim's 25-year tenure, Mediate.com received the American Bar Association's 2010 Institutional Problem Solver Award.  Before Mediate.com, Jim founded The… MORE >

Featured Members

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Listening as a Negotiation and Mediation Skill

Civil Negotiation and Mediation by Nancy Hudgins I taught a series of classes on Civil Negotiation and Mediation to law students at the National University of Mongolia School of Law...

By Nancy Hudgins
Category

AudioBlog: Speed Dialogue With Beth Katz of Project Interfaith

Join host Jeff Thompson and Beth Katz, founder and executive director of Project Interfaith- an organization dedicated to raising respect, awareness and understanding between people of all faiths. Beth shares...

By Jeff Thompson
Category

Conducting Electronic Negotiations

First published in The Negotiator Magazine. Computers have made it efficient and practical to conduct bargaining interactions electronically. Parties introduce themselves through e-mail exchanges, and send bargaining proposals back and...

By Charles B. Craver
×