Find Mediators Near You:

Taking Advantage of ADR in the Entertainment Industry

JAMS ADR Blog by Chris Poole

As courts throughout the U.S. have become more and more backlogged with cases, and as the financial stakes in litigation have grown increasingly larger, so too has the need for quality ADR mechanisms. Certain substantive legal areas lend themselves particularly well to ADR, which include Intellectual Property/Entertainment matters.

The importance of secrecy and pri­vacy, the need for expertise and the flexibility that ADR offers are three reasons why IP and entertainment practitioners should use ADR as much as pos­sible. Every time a lawsuit is filed, it becomes public record. Reporters scour the case filings for interesting cases to report. Parties can avoid this unwanted publicity by agreeing to participate in a pre-filing media­tion. If successful, the case is never filed, the facts remain confidential and the parties reach a business-like resolution while saving sub­stantial attorneys’ fees. Because many parties often have ongoing relationships to preserve, an early resolution is also likely to maintain that important relationship.

In addition to using pre-suit mediation, entertainment and IP cases make great candidates for binding arbitration. If the parties have not previously entered into a contract with an arbitration clause, the parties can still agree to bind­ing arbitration before suit is filed. Among many other advantages, arbitration is private. Therefore, even if an early mediated settlement can’t preserve the parties’ business relationship, the matter may be kept private through arbi­tration instead of the courts.

IP and entertainment matters often involve complex legal issues and technical industry concepts, which may be difficult for a jury to un­derstand. By using arbitration and mediation, the parties can select ADR professionals with substan­tial experience in entertainment and IP matters. By selecting neutrals with unique, practice area-specific experience, the parties can save time by not having to educate judges and jurors with little to no knowledge of the industry and the law.

Regardless of the outcome in any case, at least the parties have the peace of mind of knowing that their decision maker was informed and up to speed on the issues.

                        author

Jeffrey Grubman

Jeffrey Grubman, Esq. is a veteran ADR professional who has served as a mediator in approximately 1,000 cases in 22 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico in a wide variety of complex cases, including class actions and high impact, multi-party matters. Mr. Grubman works tirelessly to settle every case… MORE >

Featured Members

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

National Employment Dispute Resolution Act of 2000 (NEDRA)

(NEDRA) (Introduced in the House) HR 4593 IH 106th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4593 To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in...

By Managing Editor
Category

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): What is it, and is it the Way Forward?

Disputing Blog by Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, Beth Graham, and Holly Hayes ulio César Betancourt, Head of Research & Academic Affairs at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, and Elina Zlatanska,...

By Beth Graham
Category

When the Mediators Pay the Highest Price

Kluwer Mediation BlogRecent development in the Near East reminds how long and disastrous the Arabic-Israeli conflict is. Unfortunately, it has already claimed thousands of victims and every one of these...

By Martin Svatos
×