
This blog post originally appeared in Indisputably.
The quality of AI outputs depends on users’ skill in inputting good prompts.
That’s the premise of my new article: The Art of AI Prompting in Law and Dispute Resolution Practice.
It provides practical guidance about how to use AI tools responsibly, ethically, and effectively. It describes core skills including:
It’s important to choose the right AI tool. A brilliant prompt to the wrong tool is a bad prompt. The article includes a list of specialized legal AI tools for legal and dispute resolution practice.
You shouldn’t just take the first response – it’s important to ask follow-up questions. This article offers a long list of suggested follow-up prompts.
It also provides examples of prompts across the life of a case – before, during, and after mediation.
It cites ABA Ethics Opinion 512, which describes lawyers’ ethical duty of technological competence under the ABA Model Rules.
If you would like to see some hands-on demonstrations, I also posted two short SSRN articles with companion 30-minute videos:
AI won’t do your work for you. But it can help you do it better – and probably faster.
Take a look.
You don’t get better at listening during conflict by practicing during conflict. You get better at listening during conflict by practicing outside of conflict, where the stakes are lower and...
By Tammy LenskiMediation Blog by Diane CohenI recently had two unsatisfying small dollar amount purchases, which I would have never pursued in small claims court, but which got resolved happily through the...
By Diane CohenAfter more than 1,200 hours of actual time at the mediation table, and without apology for over simplification, I share with you some of my (perhaps naive) musings about others’...
By David Karp