Do some mediators scaremonger the parties at mediation in the name of reality testing?
Maybe I did yesterday… or did I just disguise it as a legitimate neutral intervention and label it;
1. BATNA, MLATNA, WATNA
2. Shaming (‘well, 90% of people manage to work these things through at mediation…are you really in the 10%?)
3. Becoming evaluative
4. Trivialising differences (‘will you really spend the next two years at war for the amount of difference now between you after a day in mediation?’)
5. Creating doubt in every one’s minds – ‘well, I know how that Judge approaches these kinds of cases…’
6. Threatening parties with what lies ahead of them (costs/2am wake ups)
7. RAA (Robust Risk Analysis)
Arbitration Blog by Gilberto Giusti, Pinheiro Neto Advogados, José Roberto Oliva Junior and Ricardo Dalmaso MarquesOne of the segments of the infrastructure sectors in Brazil that have lately triggered the...
By Gilberto GiustiI read the Ontario Human Rights Commission’s Policy on Competing Human Rights. One of the things that struck me was that they recommend mediation or some kind of facilitated discussion,...
By Jeanette BicknellLast month I had a commercial mediation that took an unexpected turn. It began as most of my mediations do - everyone gathered in a conference room, I framed the...
By Alex Yaroslavsky