Search Mediators Near You:

ABA Task Force on Improving Mediation Quality

The ABA Section of Dispute Resolution’s Task Force on Improving Mediation Quality completed its report in 2007 and got only average coverage at the time.

But all is forgiven now that the complete 47 page report has recently been posted on the Web.

On the Task Force were notables like John Lande, John Bickerman and Homer LaRue and it was established in response to concerns about poor-quality mediation services in commercial cases.

The worthy aim of the Task Force was to develop proposals to increase the quality and use of commercial mediation. The report contains some interesting views from the 90 mediation users (lawyers and parties) who participated in a number of focus groups.

For instance, users thought these mediator interventions are helpful in half or more of their cases:
�� 95%—ask pointed questions that raise issues
�� 95%—give analysis of case, including strengths and weaknesses
�� 60%—make prediction about likely court results
�� 100%—suggest possible ways to resolve issues
�� 84%—recommend a specific settlement
�� 74%—apply some pressure to accept a specific solution

The Task Force collected information about user perceptions of mediators utilizing analytical techniques in mediation…

“We observed in our focus groups that many reasonably sophisticated mediation users in civil cases want mediators to provide certain services, including analytical techniques.

A substantial majority of survey participants (80%) believe some analytical input by a mediator to be appropriate. Other survey questions focused more specifically on user attitudes about specific kinds of input by the mediator.

The following percentages of our users surveyed rated the following characteristics important, very important or essential:
�� 95%—making suggestions
�� about 70%—giving opinions”

No time to read the report’s 47 pages of close type?

Then go here for a summary of the key points.

Time to spare and in Boston on March 19? Then go listen to Prof. John Lande presenting at Harvard’s PON Dispute Resolution Forum.

His talk – “Empirical Research Findings on How to Improve Mediation Quality and Increase Lawyers’ Use of Interest-Based Negotiation” – is based on his own research as well as that conducted by the Task Force.


Geoff Sharp

Geoff Sharp is a Commercial Mediator from Wellington, New Zealand. Geoff works in the Asia Pacific region, including New Zealand, Malaysia, Thailand and Pacific Islands. He is a mediator resolving business problems. He is a fellow of the International Academy of Mediators and mediates complex and hotly debated litigation covering… MORE >

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


Neutral Analysis: A Powerful and Effective Tool

JAMS ADR Blog by Chris PooleIn a wide range of disputes, counsel and their clients have increasingly turned to neutral analysis and evaluation. When conducted by experienced neutral professionals with...

By Clarence Pozza

Mediation and the Power of an Apology: The Case of the Missing Snowman

This article was first published by the Missouri Lawyers Weekly (April, 2000) In February, I watched a trial involving a $38.00 gingerbread house. The plaintiff bought the house shortly before...

By Paula Young

Mediation in Turkey

Business Conflict Blog by Peter Phillips A recent trip to Turkey included a delightful visit at the offices of leading Turkish law firm Hergüner Bilgen Özeke and several of its...

By F. Peter Phillips

Find a Mediator