I mediated an interesting case today because the two opposing counsel played poker together with some regularity. What this meant is that they both had a friendly degree of distrust, as well as respect for the other’s ability to bluff, on the one hand, and to win on the other. I often see and even describe the negotiation process in a mediation as a game (usually of chess, implying strategic moves in anticipation of reciprocal moves designed to bring the opposing party to where the other wants them to be), but rarely do I overtly reference the bluffing that takes place in poker. Yet it is so apt! Consider the risk taker, the card counter, the one who is too obviously risk-adverse, or fearful of losing it all. These are frequently prototypical personalities represented in a mediation. So it was with much amusement that these two gentleman deftly conveyed their positions to me and then to one another and back and forth until they were fully engaged in the process–leaving with plans for more when additional parties (presumably not represented by part of their poker group) return to the table! There is much to be learned from excellent poker players, but when two of them meet–it’s probably best to grab a beer and let it unfold! Happy 4th of July!
Conflicts of Interest Blog by Vivian Scott My massage therapist and his wife, who have become dear friends over the past decade, lost their beautiful, spirited, and wise 25-year old...
By Vivian ScottFrom the Business Conflict Blog of Peter Phillips.My mentor at CPR Institute, former Olin General Counsel Peter Kaskell, once wrote an amusing article called something like “The 10 Worst Reasons...
By F. Peter PhillipsBusiness Conflict Blog by Peter PhillipsColleagues at both the CCPIT Mediation Centers and the newly-minted Mainland-Hong Kong Joint Mediation Center have extended invitations to what promises to be a fascinating...
By F. Peter Phillips