Just Court ADR by Susan M. Yates,Jennifer Shack, Heather Scheiwe Kulp, and Jessica Glowinski.
In an appellate mediation over the fate of a mediation program, two sides have agreed to preserve mediation. Back in 2011, Springfield, MA, passed two ordinances to deal with the foreclosure problem in the city. The first instituted a mediation program. The second required lenders to post a $10,000 bond for any foreclosures filed for vacant properties. Lenders filed suit in U.S. District Court, where the judge affirmed Springfield’s right to mandate both the bond and mediation. You can read about the rationale for both the suit and the court’s decision here. The lenders appealed and the two sides voluntarily entered mediation.
As a result of the mediation, the lenders are ready to drop their appeal if the city amends the ordinance so that lenders don’t have to post the bond if they register the property within 21 days, pay a $100 administrative fee and identify a local property manager and agent. Interestingly, the mediation ordinance will be left as is, including a $300 a day fine if the lender doesn’t comply with the ordinance.
So, at a time when lenders are working to keep mediation from becoming law in Missouri and Oregon, lenders in Massachusetts have voluntarily dropped their opposition to a mandatory program – and they did so through appellate mediation.
From Stephanie West Allen's blog on Neuroscience and conflict resolution . As I have discussed before, disputes sometimes occur between minds, sometimes between brains, and sometimes we will see what...
By Managing Editor"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Albert EinsteinEvery conflict holds the opportunity for creating improved processes and developing innovative procedures. We are all familiar with the negative attributes of...
By Lawrence KahnHow did Stanford English Professor Carol Shloss, with the pro bono help of the Stanford Center for Internet and Society’s “Fair Use Project,” take down the Estate of literary giant...
By Michael Young
