Find Mediators Near You:

The Ok Tedi Negotiations: Rebalancing the Equation in a Chronic Sustainability Dilemma

Between November 2005 and June 2007, a team from The Keystone Center helped organize and implement a multiparty negotiation process aimed at increased redress for people affected by river contamination from the Ok Tedi Mine in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Ok Tedi is often cited as one of the worst man-made environmental disasters in the world. It is also a true sustainability dilemma. The mine produces 20% of PNG’s gross domestic product but it has also disrupted the traditional food webs and lives of more than 50,000 people by putting 90,000 tons of rock waste and tailings per day into the Fly River system.


After 18 months of effort, a major benchmark was accomplished. Delegates of the nine affected regions along the river, the mining company, the government, and others concluded a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that will ultimately give the people in the impacted area about 1.1 billion kina (roughly US$350 million) in funds, projects, and services. The negotiations were arduous and, as must be expected, no one side is fully happy. Nor are all issues neatly tied up in ways that will obviate all future problems or resolve every
perceived injustice. Nonetheless, the negotiations achieved an important outcome and demonstrated a new and promising model for other discussions of similar scale and import. This paper describes the effort and offers reflections by the facilitators on what happened, how, and why. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the authors. All of the information the opinions are based on are matters of public record at http://www.wanbelistap.com and other public websites.

Read the complete report by clicking on the PDF attachment below.

Attachments to this Article

                        author

Peter Adler

Peter Adler directs ACCORD3.0, a group of independent consultants specializing in foresight, fact-finding and conseneus building. He is the former President and CEO of The Keystone Center and has held executive positions with the Hawaii Supreme Court, the Hawaii Justice Foundation, and Neighborhood Justice Center of Honolulu. Peter can also… MORE >

Featured Members

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Trump’s Approach to Conflict Resolution: Effect on Disputants and Neutrals

Originally published in the Wiley Online Library. In Getting Disputes Resolved (Ury, Brett, and Goldberg 1988), we pointed out that in seeking to resolve a dispute the parties can focus...

By Stephen Goldberg
Category

Marriage, Dystopian Society–A Story about conflict prevention

The year 2085 was when the Great Dystopian Revolution finally took full charge of Earth.  The entire planet fell under the control of huge international corporations.  Daily life was carried...

By Larry Gaughan
Category

Bad Information; Bad Decisions

PGP Mediation Blog by Phyllis G. Pollack I am a firm believer in the adage that one cannot convince someone to change her mind unless and until she is provided...

By Phyllis Pollack
×