Find Mediators Near You:

Peer Conflict Coaching: Another Dispute Resolution Option

Conflict coaching is a concept that combines dispute resolution and coaching principles. It is a one-on-one confidential and voluntary process in which coaches work with individual clients to help them resolve disputes and to prevent unnecessary ones. This may apply to a specific dispute the individual is or was involved in, or one which is anticipated. Conflict coaching is also used for people who want to gain new skills and enhance their existing ones, in general, e.g. not as they necessarily pertain to a specific dispute.

Within some organizations, there is an increased use of one-on-one coaching by internal staff trained to provide coaching. Ombuds have been providing coaching assistance for many years and to varying extents, so have some other internals, e.g. human resource professionals. The thrust of this article is about peers coaching peers, within the workplace. The concept is consistent with the notion of building internal capacity and resolving disputes as close to the source as possible, without incorporating third parties.

Peer Conflict Coaching

Peer coaching may be used for many reasons and in many contexts, including conflict. Peer conflict coaching is a specific process in which staff members coach others at their same ‘level’. That is, manager to manager, non-manager to non-manager. Peer conflict coaches have a number of functions. These may include, but are not limited, to the following:

  • coaching a peer about a past unresolved dispute that continues to adversely effect him/her
  • coaching a peer about a current workplace dispute or about preventing an unnecessary one
  • coaching a peer to prepare for a workplace mediation
  • coaching a peer post-mediation, with respect to any negative aftermath
  • coaching a peer to prepare for an anticipated challenging conversation with another co-worker, manager, direct report, etc.
  • providing emotional support and a confidential ‘gear’, regarding a dispute situation
  • directing staff to relevant resources, policies and so on, that may be of assistance.

As with other dispute resolution processes within an integrated conflict management system, or as one of the ADR programs offered in an organization, there are many variable factors to consider in the effective development of a peer conflict coaching program. The selection of coaches, their training, the parameters of their involvement, terms of confidentiality, ethical standards and so on, are all variables to be considered, in the development of such a service.


Conflict coaching is increasingly evolving as a major dispute resolution technique. The concept of peer conflict coaching will inevitably join the list of mechanisms available to organizations, in their efforts to prevent unnecessary disputes and assist staff members to effectively resolve conflict in the workplace. Not all staff choose to have a third party mediator and the option of one-on-one assistance appeals to many. Being able to access internally trained coaches, who are also peers, has additional appeal for many people.


Cinnie Noble

Cinnie Noble is a certified coach (PCC) and mediator and a former lawyer specializing in conflict management coaching. She is the author of two coaching books: Conflict Management Coaching: The CINERGY™ Model and Conflict Mastery: Questions to Guide You. MORE >

Featured Members

View all

Read these next


Power and Mediation

From Diane Cohen's BlogMuch has been written about power imbalances in mediation, and it is my belief that there is much confusion regarding the term. The term “power imbalance” seems...

By Diane Cohen

Marital Mediation is Not Therapy

A Saga of a Couple Who Chose Marital Mediation to help save their marriage. Joe and Marilyn Waters had been married for 15 years.  They had two terrific kids.  Dara,...

By Dr. Lynne C. Halem

Why Don’t Judges Just Settle Legal Disputes?

Consensus Building Approach by Larry SusskindIn some Canadian provinces, they take what is called Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) very seriously. During designated periods, litigants can choose to have a judge...

By Larry Susskind